Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:39046013
Your RP Name: Bill Andrews
Date of incident: January 14th, 2017
Time of incident (HH:MM 24hr): 2AM (For US I think it was 8AM)
Time Zone: CET
Length of Ban: About 3-4 days.
Please explain exactly what happened from start to finish: I warned this person for being a nuisance (He was making moaning and burping sounds in his microphone and running around town). After about 20 minutes I killed him, because he started singing in this microphone.
Lupus then brought me into a sit. His argument was that I waited 20 minutes to kill the person. I checked in the rules, there are NO rules saying that there is a cool-down for warnings. However, he used this rule as an argument: " After someone has offended you in a way that allows you to kill them (Except if you're in a war/raid) you have 5 minutes to kill them, or 15 minutes to place a hit." Seems like a fair point. But, something doesn't seem to fit. He brought up a rule that says that there is a cool-down over having a reason to KILL someone, not after WARN them. After I warned him, I did NOT have a reason to kill him (Until he was a nuisance again), which makes this rule unusable in the situation. Where it should have been used is AFTER I killed him, which I did after about 30 seconds after he started singing.
If you have any evidence to support this report, please give it here: I have a screenshot of the threat. http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/100603056099483568/A626B63F9AED63445BD9FB5712C5661D90DDA854/
Note: This is a very complicated situation and it does seem like it's a bit thrown around, so it would probably be good if we talked through this on TS tomorrow
(my tomorrow). However, it's a bit late for me and it's probably best if you read up the situation and then make a decision, rather than me trying to explain it on ts in weird English.